Topical Verse: Take it Easy, Mr. Heaney

Seamus Heaney was the first famous poet I ever saw read, which was a serious stroke of luck, because the man’s careful, confident, mellow delivery (in that Northern Irish accent which some writers unfairly get to have) of his poems matched how great those texts are on the page. I was twenty, I bought Opened Ground (his first major Selected volume) that night, and I have creased the hell out of it ever since; there are few books I open more, and I imagine that goes for a lot of people.

Heaney’s best work is at once intensely, almost fanatically, taken by the grubby human round of love, heartbreak, death, and all that good personal stuff; rooted in a scholar’s grasp of other texts, whether we’re talking Greek bards, Modernist fiction, or Irish folklore; and tempered with a grown-up willingness to write contemporary history into one’s work without ignoring the personal. In terms of pure musical care and pleasure, his lyrics, which often obscure their structural rigor, are magnificent on a level that Keats, Whitman, Dickinson, Auden, and maybe (maybe) a dozen other poets have attained. Heaney spent a half-century spitting fire, son.

He died yesterday at the age of 74. Over the next week or so the Anglophone world’s pop-highbrow outlets will publish tributes and assessments. Reading a couple will be enough. A few cheap contrarian blasts aside, these will correctly note that people will be reading the guy on Mars someday. But the encomiums will also be critically shallow (too many comparisons to Yeats, because DURR they were both Irish), politically tendentious (overemphasizing the admittedly great poems he wrote about The Troubles and ignoring texts set in California and elsewhere, or which aren’t geopolitically defined), and not especially interested in the words themselves so much as what cultural role he played as Famous Writer Who Taught At StanHarvardford.

The best way to send off a poet is to cite his poems. Since this probably shouldn’t be a 5-million-word post, I had to focus. It took a while to pick something, which ended up being “The Skunk,” from Field Work (1979), one of his best collections. Enjoy.

Up, black, striped and damasked like the chasuble
At a funeral Mass, the skunk’s tail
Paraded the skunk. Night after night
I expected her like a visitor.

The refrigerator whinnied into silence.
My desk light softened beyond the verandah.
Small oranges loomed in the orange tree.
I began to be tense as a voyeur.

After eleven years I was composing
Love-letters again, broaching the word ‘wife’
Like a stored cask, as if its slender vowel
Had mutated into the night earth and air

Of California. The beautiful, useless
Tang of eucalyptus spelt your absence.
The aftermath of a mouthful of wine
Was like inhaling you off a cold pillow.

And there she was, the intent and glamorous,
Ordinary, mysterious skunk,
Mythologized, demythologized,
Snuffing the boards five feet beyond me.

It call came back to me last night, stirred
By the sootfall of your things at bedtime,
Your head-down, tail-up hunt in a bottom drawer
For the black plunge-line nightdress.

Fake-Bold, Real Dumb: Obama’s Higher-Ed Fantasies

A couple of days ago, President Obama rolled up to the University of Buffalo to do something that presidents love to do: unveil Big New Plans for education.

He wore a cool blue robe, he spoke in that soothing voice, the students cheered a lot, and everybody took smartphone pics to put on Instagram, but among teachers and scholars who actually work in higher ed, the response has been overwhelmingly negative, as it should be, because the plan is a salad of PowerPoint-ready ideas that will get praised by Thomas Friedman without doing much to help American students.  In fact, Mr. Obama’s plan is likely to damage public colleges.

I don’t think Obama is a cynical man. If I did, I wouldn’t have voted for him twice. Further, he is right about many facts on the ground. College is too expensive; the student-loan system (which his administration has done little to improve long-term) is an economically debilitating scandal; graduation rates are too low, especially at two-year schools and non-flagship state universities; and it is unclear how to actually determine the fundamental utility of mass college education within the current cultural and institutional environment.

The problem is, Obama’s grand gesture fails to address the present situation’s core problems. Here are some of those.

1. Obama shows little sign of doing anything concrete about the main reason tuition is so high: the collapse of state support for university education. (Thanks, Governor Reagan!) He also fails to offer any solutions to the problem of administrative bloat or the fact that too many schools spend too much money on football stadiums and flowerbeds.

2. He has nothing to say about the appalling reliance on part-time instructors and enormous lecture-hall classes, especially at public schools. Both of these trends seriously degrade the quality of undergraduate instruction.

3. As one blogger has already pointed out, the fetish for Big Data behind Obama’s plan is similar to the reasoning that gave us the No Child Left Behind catastrophe. Rating scales are rating scales; how do you quantify the value of a seminar on Latin American history? Of an ethics class? Of a first-year writing course?

4. These Whither Higher Ed? debates are pointless if the public K-12 system keeps wheezing along, pumping out students with underdeveloped critical-thinking skills.  Obama’s concern about graduation rates is worrisome, because it could pressure schools to pass undergraduates who aren’t ready to be in college. We already do plenty of that.

5. Again with the MOOCs! Teachers may despise them, but if you’re a powerful person whose daughters’ education will continue to consist of small classes taught by expert teachers at wealthy schools (just like your own was), this reality might be hard to see.

The awful irony is that while these grand, splashy efforts to rationalize the market within which consumers make choices about education make for great speeches and flatter America’s sense of itself as a meritocracy that just needs some technocratic intervention to get back on track, they are actually examples of small-bore, short-term, cowardly thinking. They don’t require us to consider our culture’s underlying values or the long-term budget picture in a debt-ridden nation with a dying middle class.

What would require real ambition, courage, and commitment is putting college students into intimate, challenging classes taught by full-time professionals who aren’t treated like drones on the Subway line. But that doesn’t sound cutting-edge and cool. It sounds downright old-fashioned. It would cost lots of money, money that could just as easily be spent on a new deanship or used to subsidize the F-22. It would ask Americans to stop freaking out about how college isn’t worth anything unless it consists of career prep that leads to a job three hours after graduation.

And it would mean our President, who often played a populist on TV in 2008 and 2012, mounting something besides a bus tour where he goes around scolding those bad colleges.

Now to go chill on my oceanfront property in Kansas while I await this renaissance.

Weekend Beats: Gold-Plated Doors on Thirty-First Floors

Gram Parsons went hard, as in making-even-the-Rolling-Stones-worried hard, and his death at 26 from a flood of morphine and booze wasn’t any more surprising than what happened to Dylan Thomas and John Bonham. It isn’t Romantically complex and fitting when gifted human beings die young: it’s just dingy and awful, because when it happens, we all lose a layer off the thin armor that helps us get through this hurr vale of tears.

Modernity’s archival capacities do provide some comfort. Here is “Sin City” (1969), which Parsons recorded with his band The Flying Burrito Brothers. The guy spent his brief career twisting up the conventions of American honky-tonk, but his best work honors that genre’s blend of good times, Protestant guilt, and chilling melancholy.

Cash Flows (in the classroom)

Oh, hi there. Here is a dispatch from the Department of “When Teachers Talk About the Pay, They Aren’t Being Greedy, Just Honest About a Destructive Institutional Reality,” in conjunction with the Foundation for the Seemingly Obvious Fact that Treating Highly Skilled People Well Makes Them Even More Productive, with editorial assistance from the Council on DUUUUUURRRR, Ya Think?

Sometimes a situation gets so dire, you cite something Dave Eggers wrote in 2011.

Weekend Beats: Brick James Games

Even if you’re dealing with a fascinating, appalling affair like the American drug wars; even if you’re digging into the under-appreciated criminal side of things; you need a demonically inventive lyricist to make the day-to-day business of slinging weight seem to be interesting, let alone a rhapsodic practice. (That, or you need David Simon’s creative team.) Not because Drugs are Bad (although some of them are), but because Modern Business, even a violent, fluid modern business like selling lots of drugs, is fundamentally boring, at least to most people who care about what lyricists do in the first place.

Coastal-Intellectual-Approved, and working over the beat from Mobb Deep’s “Cobra,” here is a since-disbanded band of bandits, the Re-Up Gang, which includes Pusha T and Malice from Clipse, one of the greatest hip-hop duos American civilization has yet produced. Most of the 2005 mixtape it’s from (We Got it 4 Cheap, Vol. 2) is worth bumping in your Civic.

You can stop listening around 3:45, because that’s when Pharrell shows up to remind everyone that he has never been able to rap. The track also contains the usual strains of paranoia, brutality, profanity, and nihilism that rap music about the drug game usually does. Otherwise it might not have been as good.

Topical Verse: Be All That You Can Be

It is either comforting or not at all comforting to know that Silicon Valley didn’t invent the temple of life-hacking, the ruinous belief that one might perfect oneself and master existence: to know that this conceit is much older, basically post-Enlightenment modernity’s favorite way of doing things. Perfected under American Protestantism, given a cozy sheen by the techno-progressivism that emerged from Western research institutions after World War II, and now distinguished by a frantic strain indicative of life’s realities after the Great Recession, the only difference is that now there are more media platforms for spreading it. Dr. Oz and Bill Gates are winning the game. Why aren’t you? Get thee to a library, and check out some Horatio Alger.

Artists have done their bit of pushing back. Wallace Stevens put his shoulder to the wheel with “The Poems of Our Climate” (1937-1942), which emphasizes that a life of “complete simplicity,” an existence stripped of all ambiguity and uncertainty and longing, would be pretty awful. Or rather, striving for a life like that is awful, because only a lunatic would try to get it.

I.
Clear water in a brilliant bowl,
Pink and white carnations. The light
In the room more like a snowy air,
Reflecting snow. A newly-fallen snow
At the end of winter when afternoons return.
Pink and white carnations – one desires
So much more than that. The day itself
Is simplified: a bowl of white,
Cold, a cold porcelain, low and round,
With nothing more than the carnations there.

II.
Say even that this complete simplicity
Stripped one of all one’s torments, concealed
The evilly compounded, vital I
And made it fresh in a world of white,
A world of clear water, brilliant-edged,
Still one would want more, one would need more,
More than a world of white and snowy scents.

III.
There would still remain the never-resting mind,
So that one would want to escape, come back
To what had been so long composed.
The imperfect is our paradise.
Note that, in this bitterness, delight,
Since the imperfect is so hot in us,
Lies in flawed words and stubborn sounds.